The Mongol mission tree and the Mughals mission tree each give you a staggering amount of permanent claims, and the permanent rewards from Mongol missions don't go away when you tag switch. The fact that they start with a manpower bonus doesn't hurt either. I've always thought Mongolia was one of the best WC nations, due to their bonuses to CCR, AE, and separatism. I always thought I could pull off a WC, though, and now I've finally done it, using a slightly convoluted strat that I'm pretty pleased with. I've been playing EU4 for years, but usually I get bored and bail on all my games somewhere in the early 1700s. Unfortunately, many debunks of the Tartaria narrative come from people pushing competing conspiracy theories, like this guy claiming that there’s a global Jewish Phoenecian conspiracy and that Tartaria is simply rehashing the notion that Khazars were Jews in order to distract from the real Phoenecian threat And if we don’t know the reality of Eurasian history to begin with, or if we do then it's all in bits and pieces where we might not even know a basic set of dates and names, then what seems to be a pretty developed narrative about a lost empire actually turns out rather plausible. This is unsurprising given how little education most people in the West receive about basically anything east of Greece: simply put, the reality of Eurasian history is just not something most of us are taught. The Tartaria theory has a small but active following on subreddits such as r/Tartaria, r/tartarianarchitecture, and r/CulturalLayer, which as of writing have around 5,300, 2,400 and 23,000 subscribers, respectively, but it’s clear from the 8 questions on the topic asked at AskHistorians since January 2019 and this debunk request from June that it’s a theory that has somewhat broad appeal and can reach beyond its core niche. While this post will primarily address one particular piece of writing that is at the core of Tartaria conspiracy theorising, I’ll include a few tidbits to show you just how much madness its adherents have come up with. As you can tell, there’s a lot of diverse ideas here, and the fact that there hasn’t been the equivalent of a Christological schism every time a controversial thread goes up is really quite impressive. Said empire emerged… at some point, and it disappeared… at some point, but for… some reason, its existence has been covered up to suit… some narrative or another.

Its core notion is that the region known as ‘Tartaria’ or ‘Grand Tartary’ in Early Modern European maps was not simply a vague geographical designate, but in fact a vast, centralised empire. For those not in the know, the Tartaria conspiracy theory is one of the most bizarre pieces of pseudo history out there.

Eu4 multiplayer guide reddit